8 November 2005
Uncategorized
Wouldn't it be nice?
Actually, no. In between lawsuits, Love continues to tour with what he calls the Beach Boys Band, a travesty that features no Wilson brothers. Yes, this is the moral high ground on which Love stands. At issue in the suit is the creation and distribution of 2.6 million copies of a Beach Boys compilation given out with a British newspaper to promote Smile. Love’s suit claims that the disc undercut sales of Beach Boys music. Sure, and Mike Love backed by a bar band playing under the name only bolsters that marketability, right?
Posted by John Kenyon
Comments Off
4 November 2005
Uncategorized
Back to the Sandbox
As for Little Hits, it’s a nice affirmation that there are more people out there who snapped up all of those old singles from Bus Stop, Summershine, Sarah and Parasol who lament the fact that the music they contained is locked within those hard-to-hear grooves. Here’s hoping that blogger Jon Harrison’s stated goal — to contribute to interest that will eventually lead to legitimate re-issue of the works of the artists represented, or wider recognition of already available releases — is realized.
Posted by John Kenyon
Comments Off
2 November 2005
Uncategorized
Floating away on a Tuesday night
That catalog is full of good discs and great songs that make me, on further reflection, realize they’re one the better bands we have these days. More to the point, last night’s show proved that on any given night, they may just be the best live band out there. With a mix of roots rock, Springsteen bombast, Philly Soul and punk spirit, they play music that sounds like a lot of different things while all still sounding like Marah.
Posted by John Kenyon
Comments Off
1 November 2005
Uncategorized
Tonight's the night… all week
Posted by John Kenyon
Comments Off
31 October 2005
Uncategorized
Under review
Posted by John Kenyon
Comments Off
30 October 2005
Uncategorized
It's a sin
Posted by John Kenyon
Comments Off
28 October 2005
Uncategorized
Some favorite things
Each has much to recommend it. The Monk release features a group previously thought unrecorded save for the interesting but sonically inferior Discovery! Live at the Five Spot disc that came out in 1997. Here, Coltrane is four months into his work with Monk’s group. Jazz lore reports that Trane was tentative at first in playing Monk’s odd compositions, but that is clearly not the case here as he blows with authority. This show, Nov. 29, 1957 at Carnegie Hall, is fantastic. This was the point at which Coltrane was starting to lead his own groups — his wonderful Blue Train was released earlier that year — and it is clear from this performance that he was more than ready.
The new disc under Coltrane’s name finds this saxophone colossus seven years and a lifetime later, performing with his classic quartet at a New York club. The group is near its end — A Love Supreme was already in stores and Coltrane was heading into uncharted territory that would find him leaving McCoy Tyner, Jimmy Garrison and Elvin Jones behind. But for these two sets, these four men are playing as one, proving that on any given night, you just might wander into a place and see the best show of your life.
Less has been written about the Gillespie/Parker set, though there are a few reviews out there if you hunt around. You may have to hunt to find the disc itself, but it’s worth the trouble. Hearing it is like popping open a time capsule, releasing into the air the sound of one of the best jazz pairings in history. The sound isn’t as crisp as on the other two discs here, but that is a minor quibble. When the reliably late Parker strides onto the stage midway through the opening tune, “Bebop,” to take over for Don Byas, the electricity in the room is transferred through the speakers and doesn’t let up until the final note is blown.
Posted by John Kenyon
Comments Off
25 October 2005
Uncategorized
Dust in the wind
“It’s disappointing to listen to these albums as they make us wonder whether either artist can ever be vital again,” writes Ben French. As I’ve written here, I would agree with regard to Young. Springsteen, however, is another matter. When he fails, it feels as if he is trying too hard. When Young fails, it feels as if he isn’t trying hard enough.
With Devils and Dust, there is much to like. Where it bogs down are the points at which it seems like he’s trying to channel the dusty textures of Nebraska or even The Ghost of Tom Joad, rather than perform the songs in their best form and then worry about whether they fit the album as a whole. The same problem plagued The Rising to a certain extent, as weaker songs were given the full-blown USA treatment as Bruce sought to offer a balm for the nation.
Left with the task of simply recording an album of good songs without the need to soothe the soul of a country — or pat it on the back and say everything will be all right in about 3 1/2 years — I’m confident Springsteen can delivery another winner.
Young, on the other hand, just doesn’t seem capable. While Prairie Wind is growing on me still — I’m past what French writes about disappointing albums from favorite artists: “These are the albums you play a few times and don’t really enjoy, play a few more times hoping to find something to like, and then never play again to protest the disenchantment” — it doesn’t feel like things are going to get any better than this.
Posted by John Kenyon
Comments Off


Follow TIRBD on Twitter
Feedburner Feed
Get the Comments Feed